Transportation was always an indispensable part of our lives and has become one of the most controversial areas of our modern lives. While some people are of the opinion that most governments' revenue should allocate in constructing railways instead of roads, I believe both these modes of transport should be treated equally.
To begin with, using train is beneficial to the environment as it carries more passengers while its carbon emission is less. The reason is extending train lines will eliminate the needs for transporting by personal cars which is one of the main reasons for air pollution and global warming. Furthermore, travelling by train is not only more convenient, faster, and safer than cars but also it is cost-effective. In other word, Commuters who travel by this way will assure they are on time at work, and they are less likely to stuck in traffic or have road accident.
However, one should consider that places such as inside of cities and some specific geographical areas are not suitable for railways. In addition to this, the budget needs for expanding railway networks is extremely higher than roads. Consequently, it is better that roads are constructed in every corner of country for the benefit of people. Having said that, travelling by car is easy and enjoyable as you are not restricted by time-table and fixed destination. For aforementioned reasons the importance of roads should not be neglected and sufficient money should be considered to it.
In conclusion, It is true that train is more eco-friendly and economical compared with cars. Nevertheless, the importance of roads especially in specific locations should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ome people are of the opinion that most governments revenue should allocate in constructing...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16911764706 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01509143876 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5139555767 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.153846154 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165672613675 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557488048489 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418113165385 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952005827126 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036708726146 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.