People no longer use newspapers and televisions because the internet plays the same role. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The internet is a modern day reality and gradually becoming a necessity of life. It has affected all spheres of day to day living and media is no exception to it. Many people have shifted their attention from the traditional modes of getting the latest information, as a result, the television and the newspapers have lost the charm. I tend to strongly agree that surfing internet not only gives access to the same entertainment but also enhances the experience by providing a flexibility.
Nowadays, almost everyone is owning at least a gadget or a mobile phone with the facility of a web-based access. It has revamped the purpose of the media houses, and they are prompt to adjust with the new development in order to stay relevant. This is because most of the newspapers have initiated an electronic version of their publications whereas the television programs, shows, and even films are available on demand basis.
The other convincing factor which contributed to this phenomenon is mobility and ease. Earlier, one has to go to the designated place in the home to watch their favorite programs while readers used to carry bulky books or papers for embarking on their necessary reading experience. Conversely, everything has been shrunk to one handheld device with the capabilities of the internet. It does not matter now if you are traveling or at a remote location, if you are connected with the internet, you are connected with the whole world.
To sum up, the internet has revolutionized the media and journalism industries by providing similar or even enhanced services. Many are preferring e-subscriptions of newspapers and their favorite channels over the traditional means.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...exibility. Nowadays, almost everyone is owning at least a gadget or a mobile phone wit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...similar or even enhanced services. Many are preferring e-subscriptions of newspapers and their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, whereas, while, as to, at least, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13357400722 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96514526357 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602888086643 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3396373939 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.384615385 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168910352804 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474394568213 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372767868271 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872285773475 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373775435889 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.