People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Throughout history, literature has always been one of the main focuses of humans' interests, starting from religious books to science fictional ones and many others. In this sense, an opinion exists that people ought to read solely scientific books which are based on the solid facts without any sort of fiction. I strongly disagree with the above-mentioned position due to the reasons marked hereinafter.
Firstly, for decades, fictional literature has been pushing forward the majority of scientific explorations in almost every possible area. In particular, medicine and engineering are experiencing a boost of issued patents, a few of those have their roots in futuristic magazines and even comics. Robotic arms in surgery, for instance, are based on ideas which were illustrated in early series of widely known comics of the sixties. Unless the authors of those ideas were not familiar with them, the inventions in this area could be postponed till the next decade or longer. In other words, the bond between technological advancements and science fiction is clearly strong, and therefore, should be broken for any reason.
Secondly, highly technical articles are comprehensible for a limited group of highly educated people, who most likely are adults. This means that the youngsters could not easily grasp ideas from there and, possibly, develop their own ones afterwards. This vital issue is of a paramount importance since the next generation of doctors and engineers are to consist of them. Thus, imaginary plot surrounding sophisticated concepts of the story may assist the reader to provide more profound insights into it.
In conclusion, I strongly oppose the idea of reading exclusively non-fictional literature, especially for adolescents since many technological innovations might lately been discovered by them and are based on imaginative pieces of work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, sort of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47931034483 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94408655782 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665517241379 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0147894818 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.230769231 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0885157333876 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301876253209 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424203750431 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524973352746 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553235782006 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.