People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before.
Is it a positive or negative development?
People’s lifestyle has a close link with their income. In recent years, their income has significantly increased and as a result, their lifestyle has been altered dramatically and they buy more goods than before. In this essay, the pros and cons of this new trend will be analyzed and it will answer whether this is a beneficial phenomenon?
On the one side, more purchases by people can be justified with the economic growth that it causes. It creates more job opportunities and let more people have a decent income. Recent research has shown that in recent years the income of people has increased by 80 percent and the number of job opportunities has increased by 200 percent. Consequently, the unemployment rate has decreased remarkably.
On the other side, many of the bought products are non-environmentally friendly and will not be degraded in the near future. What continuous of this trend may cause is serious damage to the environment. For example, look at the people in a supermarket and see the products they choose and also how they carry them. In many cases, you will see people get products that contain plastic and even they will carry them in plastic bags that are not biodegradable and will remain in the environment for a long time. Great damage to the environment is the consequence.
In summary, more money in the hand of people has caused more purchases of products which leads to economic growth while damages the environment. This trend is unstoppable and has some positive effects. Therefore, it is suggested that governments interfere with setting some rules to protect the environment and also educate people to demand more eco-friendly products to mitigate its negative effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in summary, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10211267606 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94366828964 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510563380282 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2817655942 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177644630952 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550463363243 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517322379176 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10420550906 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412948412414 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.