People who have original ideas are of much greater value to society than those who are simply able to copy the ideas of others well To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

The human being has been blessed with the power of thought process and is undoubtedly the best thing that humans possess. The ideas play a very pivotal role for us to generate new things for our use. However, this had led to an argument that original ideas are valuable than the ones who copy. I partially agree and disagree with the said statement.

On the one hand, the ideas are part of intellect that a person possesses and should be well regarded. It is important for everyone to respect the idea which has come from the person who thought of it as the idea in some manner may change something in our life. For instance, the creator of the first mobile phone had never thought that the communication will be revolutionized; however, it was after a span of few years that the change came. However, initially, nobody thought that the idea could be useful. Thus, the ideas should be respected.

On the other hand, one has to bear in mind that every idea that one may come across can never be self-sufficient and always has a room for improvement in one place or the other. Therefore, it is wrong to say that the ideas which are modified or copied should be held on a less pedestal. There have been many inventions which have been later modified to make it best. Further, the possibility of two minds thinking alike can never be ruled out. For example, the first cell phone that was invented was the basic phone and now the phones have undergone tremendous changes, the efforts of people who contributed towards the said development cannot be snatched away.

In my opinion, all the ideas have room for improvements and cannot be sidelined just because it is a similar idea to the one that has already been talked about or made an impact. The room for improvement is always there. The changes take place on daily basis and in future, all the present ideas will be used to modify the present existence.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (10 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e changes take place on daily basis and in future, all the present ideas will be used to ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60997067449 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45882842815 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4939937246 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4705882353 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201507573769 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739272618472 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578340312298 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133805956882 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446739825988 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.