The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to increase staff productivity?
The success of a company is indubitably based on the outstanding services rendered by its employees as there is little doubt that the workers are the non-depreciable priceless asset of any organization. Increasing the productivity of human resources is one of the top priorities of companies giving both monetary and non-monetary benefits, making the employees feel that they are an inseparable part of the firm.
A well-established company having a great vision about the future of its existence and unless they make efforts to motivate the employees, their economy would be crippled. Most of the august companies have always been interested in providing benefits in cash and in-kind; for instance, house rent allowances and rent-free accommodation, turbocharging their prodigious employees to accomplish their desires in life. Besides, when companies take the initiative to organise tours and family get-together, giving them an immense exhilaration and thereby acknowledging the workers that they are the part and parcel of the corporate family.
The ever increasing corporate culture, nevertheless, has become a cynosure amid companies, regardless of its size, compelling firms to set targets to strive in the cut-throat competitive business environment. The employees, further, have to undergo rigorous and target-oriented work in order to meet the expectation of the management. Despite all the facilities employees have taken granted, the managers have the legitimate right to ensure the output produced by the staff within the stipulated time. Although it might be stressful, the diligence of employees could not have utilized by the companies to reap the harvest had there not been a stiff competition
Overall, notwithstanding the never-ending ongoing rivalry among companies, the employers have to encourage their stupendous employees through emoluments and other benefits ensuring their tremendous performance in attaining the desired organizational goals
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79381443299 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31309261937 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5857948052 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.333333333 106.682146367 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147939720907 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563434264876 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282249046109 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802008404464 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269562675353 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.0946893788 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.