There is no denying the fact that the phenomenon of encountering more youth compare to older people is ubiquitous across the globe due to its paramount importance. One school of thought opines that it is worthless, however, others consider that a couple of problems also occur because of the same. Although this has a plethora of merits yet numerous demerits are also there which will be elaborated in upcoming paragraphs.
Initiating with the best possible benefits, the most significant advantage is youth people can get more done in terms of industry-related jobs. Along with it, the economy is more dependent on young people who can provide energy and hardworking which labor market demands. To cite an example, most companies in Silicon Valley hire young engineers because they can provide better risk-taking skills than old people. As a result, it can be true if it is said that countries with more youth population, are leading the world economic forums.
On the paradoxical side, there are many drawbacks as well. First and foremost is the experience which comes with old people who have been working in an era for many years. For instance, many investors and stock market professionals are old men who have years of experience in that market. Secondly, problem-solving almost comes with the experience of facing problems and potential solutions. Consequently, old people are most suit for jobs that need more problem-solving skills.
To conclude, without any doubt, this is a mixed bag. If this topic has many positives then the negative points of this notion may not be underestimated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...without any doubt, this is a mixed bag. If this topic has many positives then the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12643678161 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89946942996 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60153256705 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2399418259 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123822673163 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407178569178 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305541382127 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693234191761 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247037143312 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.