Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or 5 should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of government should make a better network for public transport for cities that are now expanding and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that build more roads to facilitate car ownership by the government can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, making a better network for public transport or building roads to facilitate car ownership in expanding cities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, expanding cities need more roads or better network for public transport made by the government might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a better network for public transport or more roads to facilitate car ownership in expanding cities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-13 | amirnaji24 | 85 | view |
- "The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn” – Alvin Toffle. What do you understand from Alvin’s statement? Elaborate on your understanding and support your point 80
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives 71
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are come conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 85
- Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? Discuss your views. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58843537415 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12604279422 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58843537415 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9217280618 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.363636364 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413845189294 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133976282026 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150822970242 0.071462118173 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247196546059 0.151781067708 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794931758603 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.