At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages

Currently, in several countries the proportion of young adults are bigger than older people. There are some benefits and drawbacks which are caused by this situation. However, I believe that the benefits do not surpass the disadvantages because of some reasons.

On the one hand, younger people, who consist of people aged 20s to 30s, are living in their peak condition. This makes their bodies to function maximally which makes them to be healthier and stronger if compared to older people. Because of this, younger people can be more productive and creative than older people. As a result, they will be productive workforce and will invent lot of new creative inventions, which will be advantageous for the country.

On the other hand, younger people tend to be lazier and effortless if compared to older people. This is because they are living in the era where technology has developed rapidly. The rapid development of technology has ease a lot of things in the world which has reduced the effort needed to get something. Thus, even though younger people are healthier and stronger than older people, if they are more indolent than older people, they will not be productive, and will not give benefits to the country. For instance, Niger is a country which is dominated by more young people than older people. It is known that young people in Niger are sluggish and have poor work ethic. As a result, Niger is included in one of the poorest country in the world.

In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of having more young people than old people do not surpass the disadvantages because although young people are healthier and stronger than older people, they tend to be more indolent than older people which will result to less productive inhabitants.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94966442953 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5714968947 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426174496644 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7436340042 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189825365949 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801376308119 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463309238323 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146979101592 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410054267179 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.