Q) Some people believe that companies should manufacture products that last for a long time. Others feel that the emphasis should be placed on producing goods that are cheap. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Certain people are of the view that manufacturing of long-lasting products ought to be the main goal of companies. However, others think that importance should be given to manufacturing affordable products. In my opinion, producing long lasting goods should be encouraged as it offers advantages for consumers and the environment.
On the one hand, the manufacturing of high-quality products benefits the consumers in the form of the availability of durable products. As such products function for a longer time period, people do not require the need to replace or repair them over a period of time, saving consumers money. Moreover, such good quality products are discarded less often and do not add up to already existing waste products, thereby, benefiting the environment. For instance, If plastic products are made of good quality, they will be less discarded by people as compared to low-quality one-time plastic products.
On the other hand, factories producing less expensive products help to maintain equality in the society. In other words, this enables people from lower income groups to buy and utilise the same but cheap products which their rich counterparts are using. For example, there are innumerable cheap brands of consumer goods available in the market. Furthermore, the availability of low-priced products spurs economic growth in a country. As there is greater demand for low-priced products, it leads to more manufacturing and, thereby greater employment.
A close examination of both the views reveal that it is necessary to undertake the production of durable products to prevent society from becoming a throw-away society.
In conclusion, although many people vary in their opinions, I believe that manufacturing good quality products is the need of the hour if we are to save the environment and people’s hard-earned money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es for consumers and the environment. On the one hand, the manufacturing of hi...
^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e need to replace or repair them over a period of time, saving consumers money. Moreover, suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce or repair them over a period of time, saving consumers money. Moreover, such g...
^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...air them over a period of time, saving consumers money. Moreover, such good quality prod...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow-quality one-time plastic products. On the other hand, factories producing l...
^^^
Line 6, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...turing and, thereby greater employment. A close examination of both the views re...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y from becoming a throw-away society. In conclusion, although many people vary...
^^^
Line 10, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough many people vary in their opinions, I believe that manufacturing good qualit...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onment and people’s hard-earned money.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46206896552 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04918070515 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5036889586 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34394016679 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11925257353 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722344689223 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187128991375 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107807533847 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.