In recent years, people watch more movies from overseas. What are the reasons for this? Should the government give financial support to local cinema to produce local films?
It is undoubtedly the growing demand to watch more movies from foreign countries over against the film that has been made in local countries. There are several reasons for this preference and various
It can be seen that the principal reason for this situation is the advent of the Internet and globalization of culture. In past, Children growing up, only had access to traditional movies that have been made in their home country. But in the Internet era, they not only access to traditional and local movies, but they also can watch worldwide films. Owing to the intense special effects of the international movies, people mostly prefer Hollywood blockbusters versus a domestic cinema.
The reason that international cinema is more popular and seems dominant to local one is financial. The budget that allocated Hollywood and Bollywood compare with home country produced films have an extreme monetary resource, such as great studios and high technology equipment to make films that is beyond our imagination and sales billion dollars in box office.
I personally believe that government ought to take action to persuade their residents to watch local films. With regard to international movie preference, government can play its part by supporting local film producers and offer some facilities to them, in order to preserve domestic films and encourage citizens to watch their films. Moreover, promoting more video on demand websites would be an appropriate improvisation for developing national movies. Besides, these activities, not only preserve local culture, but would also give chances to local producers to grow and become more experienced and talented.
In conclusion, it is unquestionable that there is a comprehensive tent to watch foreign movies. Since Hollywood have enriched film studios and billions of dollars allocated to its film industry. However, the national government could address this significant expansion of international movies, if they subsidized the local films.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons for this preference and various It can be seen that the principal reason...
^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
... Internet and globalization of culture. In past, Children growing up, only had access t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47419354839 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87244615794 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4292562109 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.214285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356543137906 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115766139942 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668369588849 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198663407337 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736162874882 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.