Restricting air travel is the only way to prevent air pollution.
Do you agree?
All over the world today, it can be observed that the issue of air pollution has grown in importance over the past few decades. Some believe that the only method of reducing air pollution is to limit the number of flights. I disagree with the statement because limiting the number of flights can be one way; however, other measures such as properly regulating the motor vehicles and other modes of transport such as truck and buses.
To begin with, it’s undeniable that aeroplane cause air pollution as they produce a huge amount of carbon dioxide which causes a lot of pollution in atmosphere and leads to global warming. For example, it is estimated by Green Peace that 13,000 tonnes of CO2 has been released in atmosphere by aeroplanes every year, thus increasing the carbon footprint in the air. Although it is possible to control this pollution by reducing the frequency of flights, it will not fully solve the problem, because the majority of pollutants in the air do not come from aircrafts and as such it cannot be considered the number one cause of air contamination.
In Accordance, the major cause of air pollution is the emission of poisonous gases in air by vehicles and factories. There are millions of cars on the road, which uses fossil fuels in turn releases toxic gases, thus it contributes in bad air quality. Factories also release plenty of gases in the air, which are also a contributing in global warming. Therefore, limiting the use of private transportation and harsher restriction on factories owners can aid in reducing the numbers, hence, subsidising electric car and aware the public the downside of burning fossil fuels and other chemicals.
In conclusion, restricting air traffic can lessen the air pollution but not totally eradicate it. Air pollution is caused by a different number of factors but just not only by planes, hence, limitation of air flights are not a proper solution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9537037037 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73884061316 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4274300506 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34389794855 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146709546853 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904693810363 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229900802049 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804291837881 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.