As a result of tourism and increasing number of people travelling there is a growing demand for more flights. What problem does this have on the environment? What measures can be taken to solve the problem?
Over the past few years, the tourism industry has witnessed a major boom in travelling; since it has become convenient for all, the demand for flights have grown tremendously. Despite the increasing popularity of flights, it has adversely affected the environment. In this essay, I will discuss the environmental problem caused by the aviation industry and suggest ways to tackle it.
To begin with, air pollution is viewed as a pressing issue caused by the frequent flights. Admittedly, the quality of air has declined due to the release of harmful gases from the airplane. To exemplify, it was found in a study that carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide are released in the atmosphere when airplane fuel combust; consequently, it significantly contributes to the thinning of ozone layer. Provided that air pollution has an adverse effect on global warming. So, air pollution causes the release of hazardous gases, which has a detrimental impact on our surrounding.
Nevertheless, there are ways to cure the problem caused by evolution. Firstly a stringent legislation can be posed by the government to limit the number of flights. Such an action can positively influence the environment by preventing the release of harmful gases. Secondly, the use of biofuels should be fostered in the aviation industry. Biofuels are there are you from plant and animal materials which releases less little gases then either if you would like petrol and diesel. Hence restricting the number of flights and biofuels can help to alleviate the environmental pollution.
To conclude, tourism industry popularity has surged the frequency of daily flights; this has resulted in air pollution which poses threats to the environment. Reducing the number of flights and green fuels usage can help to combat the pollution caused by airplanes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[8]
Message: “Provided that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ributes to the thinning of ozone layer. Provided that air pollution has an adverse effect on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...erials which releases less little gases then either if you would like petrol and die...
^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...er if you would like petrol and diesel. Hence restricting the number of flights and b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30344827586 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9332324416 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.587360301 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163698340272 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508809708324 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456656682399 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104049631846 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625384551659 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.