Over recent years, it is being a hot debatable issue among this society that in this sophisticated society is anticipating the practical knowledge than arts or history related. However, in this fast pace world barely need the presence of mind to make the opportunity of employment and the reasons are summarized below.
First and foremost, the rapid growth in this community triggers the parents to pondering about their infants life in terms of employment for their shining future. Furthermore the increasing number of population lead to the raise in the number of universities, which made the university to demarcate the demand of fees structure, it is augmented more then 2 fold than erstwhile, but, the number of industries is remain the same, so the scant option to the students to choose the employment prospects, and these are the prime reasons why the people move on to the other opportunity sectors. In addition to this, in this present scenario, the extreme knowledge of tackling situation and managerial skills are the prominent requirements in the working environment, which does not possible in arts related stream, hence pupil are preferring to go on technical side to originate the bright future.
On the other hand, it is irrefutable fact that history and philosophy are the important subject, which describes the ancient culture and tradition, students would get immense knowledge of their ancestors, and so many historical incidents. Nevertheless, according to the chances of employment in industries needs certain practical work not theoretical data’s. Besides, the vast amount of job opportunity in technical field is prevalent on around the world comparing to the arts sector, so they can opt their own job.
To conclude this, it seems to me that in this hectic world, the knowledge of technical and practical would be the conducive one to the students based on their employment prospects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...of employment for their shining future. Furthermore the increasing number of population lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...of fees structure, it is augmented more then 2 fold than erstwhile, but, the number ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...while, but, the number of industries is remain the same, so the scant option to the st...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 822, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ble in arts related stream, hence pupil are preferring to go on technical side to originate th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...nt on around the world comparing to the arts sector, so they can opt their own job. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92508323088 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.2166055924 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.666666667 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2222222222 20.7667163134 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7777777778 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0952755720369 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397219089508 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230307931748 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555618146303 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142203668241 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.