Science is advanced so fast that it can now make it possible for people to live 100 years or even 200 years. Some people think it is beneficial, while others think it will cause problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With advancement in medicine, the longevity of the person has increased and people tend to live for more than 100 years. Whether having long life is viewed as beneficial or dismal? This conundrum is mulled over in the given essay below.
Countries like Japan and Switzerland boasts of higher life expectancy of their people and this is achieved due to reasons like accessibility of good healthcare systems. Usually, people fear death and everyone wants to live as long as possible. It’s a happy moment for humans to see their grandchildren and witness their growth. With extremely busy work schedule, there is a little time left for people to spend on their hobbies and leisure activities during their youth, which they postpone to be accomplish at the time of retirement. Also, with old people around they can retell the history of their period and impart their wisdom to newer generations.
On the contrary, some view living longer than average age as a curse. Not all the old people are healthy, some of them suffer from chronic diseases and dementia and are dependent on others for help and often lonely. In most developed countries government funds for expensive healthcare procedure. With the growing aging population and energy boosting medications, many old people tend to work past their retirement age. Resultant to which, many youths do not find opportunities as companies do not wish to let go their experienced employees and hire inexperienced young people.
Based on the above discussion, aging population with dysfunctional life and disabilities are certainly not considered positive. However, if the person is aging with no illness and is healthy, it would be helpful for the society to gain the wisdom and advice from such old people for critical decisions in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'postpone being'.
Suggestion: postpone being
...tivities during their youth, which they postpone to be accomplish at the time of retirement. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 303, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... such old people for critical decisions in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople for critical decisions in future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17064846416 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74647132767 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5204959942 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155779090576 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562338358748 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495068002614 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101009311886 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325132886896 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.