Science is advanced so fast that it can now make it possible for people to live 100 years or even 200 years. Some people think it is beneficial, while others think it will cause problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
This is a controversial issue. Some people believe that advancement in technology has increased the life span of the average person which has benefited in mammoth longevity, disease-free life as well as earning a livelihood for a long time. While others hold the opposite view. This essay shall look into both sides before forming an opinion.
On the one hand, It cannot be denied that mechanization has provided the multifarious benefits, especially to humans. One of its colossal advantages is increasing the life span of the manhood. Ultimately, the scientist has achieved the half superficial power of the god such as doctors in the operation theatres saving the life of an ill person. Moreover, through its practical knowledge and years of practices scientist has made the life of millennials extraordinary. There is a little doubt that in the bygone days, people couldn't be recovered from the prolonging ailments such as cough, cancer, diabetes, heart attack and so on. Currently, the scientist has accomplished the discoveries of precarious disease such as cancer. Not only the person can be treated of this disease but also cured of this by giving a new life through medications. It is proved that the scientist has investigated the treatment of cancer. It goes without saying that with the new medicines and ailments elderly people are living their lives up to 100's and more. With the range of variety of tablets and treatments for every disease, the practitioners have expanded their horizon.
On the other hand, to some extent, I believe that it is refutable that present scenario of competing for each other in every aspect of the world can be spoiled by some of the mischiefs of the society. In other words, people who want to take revenge for anyone can take the benefit of scientific techniques in an evil way. To put it simply, there are few movies in which it is prescribed how a doctor has used the injection on the superstar to make his body feeble so that he can replace him. Secondly, atomic bombs are made to save the world from any uncertainties. Unfortunately, they are used illegally by terrorists to attack the rebellions.
To recap, after gauging both the aspects, I have no qualms in asserting that unlimited researches will affect us in undesirable ways despite the facts of longevity, antiaging injections, treatments and etc. Certainly, excess of everything is bad. The scientist cannot take the place of god when there are droughts, earthquakes, tsunamis and other natural disasters due to their excessive researches .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s earning a livelihood for a long time. While others hold the opposite view. This ess...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e doubt that in the bygone days, people couldnt be recovered from the prolonging ailmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y aspect of the world can be spoiled by some of the mischiefs of the society. In other word...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an evil way" with adverb for "evil"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ke the benefit of scientific techniques in an evil way. To put it simply, there are few movies...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...evity, antiaging injections, treatments and etc. Certainly, excess of everything is bad....
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cannot take the place of god when there are droughts, earthquakes, tsunamis and ...
^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...asters due to their excessive researches .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03546099291 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89190569478 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7897161598 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8181818182 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170787759832 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395315218988 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435590138603 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988906243569 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448156753867 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.