In the modern world, people evaluate science and technology higher than music and art. I agree with the statement because scientists and technology experts affect the whole mankind more than artists and musicians.
On the one hand, in the modern, stressful days, art and music help people to relief stress. They listen to different songs, read fiction books, or watch adventurous films. Additionally, when people are engaged in music, painting, dance, or literature, they are also learning how to develop new concepts, build vocabulary, and understand a new language. Therefore, arts and music are important in terms of human psychology and creativity, which is one of the top five skills employers search for in the 21st century.
On the other hand, the world is reshaping and will be reshaping thanks to science and technology. New technologies such as the internet, mobile phones, computers are everywhere. They provide people with endless information, entertainment, video communication, and more education opportunities. Therefore, science always has high significance. Moreover, there is a science race among countries. Correspondingly, people who are engaged in science and technology have more work opportunities with a good salary and a stable career. As a result, they are valued more in society.
To conclude, although arts and music are important for psychology and creativity of people, science and technology affect people and their lifestyle more. Therefore, scientists and technology experts are evaluated higher.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58798283262 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0697047985 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592274678112 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4410424579 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5333333333 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184828257844 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682260365123 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813447841057 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141331571685 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105548197194 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.