Language is essential, so that people can communicate with each other. However, many learned professional believe that in years to come, people all over the world will be communicating in a single language. According to me, this definitely has a devastating effect not only on the nation but on the society too. This essay will discuss the negative implication of having a single language worldwide.
Having a common global language definitely has its advantageous. Firstly, people all over the world will be able to communicate without language barriers. For example people from China will be able to interact with people from the Gulf countries. Secondly, having similar linguistic skills creates social bonding between people of different race, origin and religion. For instance, in present scenario, many people who cannot speak English find themselves socially isolated as they are unable to communicate with the masses. Lastly, having a common language plays a vital role in globalization too, as people can travel or study in country of their choice without having to worry of language barrier.
According to me, having a common language globally will definitely affect many countries which are rich in their culture and tradition. Countries around the world have its own identity because of their diverse cultural background as well as their difference in linguistic skill. Firstly, having a common language will have mitigating effect of the culture. For example, countries like India where tradition and culture is given great importance; change in linguistic skill will have mitigating effect on the culture and tradition. Secondly, countries will definitely lose their importance and identity thus affecting tourism to a great extent. Lastly, valuable information written in their native language will soon be lost forever as future generation will no longer be able to translate the scriptures.
In conclusion, having a single language brings the world together but reduces the cultural difference. However, it has adverse effect on the society and the countries identity. Therefore countries need to concentrate to retaining their existence by protecting their culture and language.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... be communicating in a single language. According to me, this definitely has a devastating effe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...having to worry of language barrier. According to me, having a common language globally will...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...s adverse effect on the society and the countries identity. Therefore countries need to c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the society and the countries identity. Therefore countries need to concentrate to retain...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... protecting their culture and language.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5325443787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80873182694 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511834319527 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3455634476 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4210526316 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166017921664 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643753060443 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484936415535 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109185696746 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584100687622 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.