Scientists say that in the future of humanity will speak the same language
Is this a positive development or negative development?
Learning a language has always been a challenging task and plays a key role in the development and growth of an individual. It is asserted by some experts that all humans will speak one common language in coming time. While this trend has both pros and cons, yet it seems to be a positive evolution.
On the one hand, there are a few demerits of this drift, which can not be ignored. The first and foremost drawback is that it is threatening for global diversity. As a matter of fact, it usually seen that culture and tradition of a place dies, when their native language dies. For example, some people, the young generation in particular, may underestimate the value and meaning of their language, greatly damaging their own hometown' s traditions and identity. In contrast, if people around the world spoke the same language, foreign visitors to Vietnam would no longer have a chance to enjoy the rich historical heritage of Vietnamese language and cultures. Besides this, many courses in specific language department would become redundant. Thus, knowledge these languages would not only remain unattainable, but also many professional experts become jobless.
On the other hand, this movement has a plethora of benefits. The prominent advantage is that language would not be remain any barrier in acquiring esteemed education and career opportunities available anywhere in the world. In fact, it would provide ample chances to youngsters to broaden their horizons, personally and as well as professionally. To illustrate, nowadays, a number of intelligent and talented students are not able to study in their desired colleges and nations because of the lack of understanding of native languages of respective countries. Consequently, they have limited career options, which may not be remain the same case, if whole world start communicating in a common language. In addition to it, speaking the same tongue promote better mutual understanding between people from different geographic locations, which will not only increase business and trade, but also helps to solve many international level disputes on the basis of culture and religion. Furthermore, it will end the discrimination on the basis of language, which lead to a peaceful and prosperous society.
In conclusion, although this movement may have some demerits, yet certainly, it is a positive development in terms of removing language barriers, building mutual understanding and eliminating language discrimination.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, in particular, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35204081633 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05122089984 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56887755102 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5885791147 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8888888889 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13925602197 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408604869967 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415752593818 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103565061463 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560340995653 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.