Self-driving vehicles pros and cons? to what extend do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been colossal upsurge in the ongoing trend that drive-less vehicles are always tremendous ways of benefits, be it an impoverished or affluent nation. Some people believe that self-driving is an artificial intelligence played a pivotal and spectacular aid in life of human being. While others disagree. In this essay, I will elaborate both the escalating and plummeting facets of autonomous driving.
At the outset, there are myriad benefits, firstly, in today’s world the advance technology of drive-less vehicles made easier means of travel, highly sophisticated technology covers longer distance in the shortest time, programmable software a great aid to human life. For example, in most of the countries, human driving, heavy traffic over in cities, stressed up situations, anxiety, or drunk lead to crashes, accidents and thus increase in fatality rates. Clearly, thanks to the technology which served a lot and the safest means of travel.
However, there are some pitfalls that can overwhelmed on potential benefits of drive-less technology. The primary concern stems from the fact that self-driving is a failure in human life, the software & hacking that can lead to treats; crashes or road accidents and so on. For instance, a survey conducted by driving school in Perth contemplated that 35% of people failed when tested to participate in human drive resulted lack in driving skills in case of emergency, it also noted there are many chances of hacking software, during drive can divert in criminal activities. Apparently, drive-less technology made tougher human life by increasing fatality rates, violence; culprits and made them dependent utterly on autonomous technology.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that despite the benefits of artificial intelligence are the instrumental indeed, but the upsides of negative impacts on self-driving are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...spectacular aid in life of human being. While others disagree. In this essay, I will ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 740, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndent utterly on autonomous technology. To recapitulate from the arguments afore...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5652173913 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03259331633 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612040133779 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6265991068 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131956951565 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455810160439 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359570586543 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079419650479 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291803380454 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.