Social media has completely changed the way family and friends communicate with each other. WHAT are the reasons for this? IS this a positive or negative development?
It is true that routes of communication between family members and pals have been greatly changed since the advent of social media platforms. The reasons behind such a trend are variable, and I believe that this change has its benefits as well as drawbacks.
People have become tethered to their cell phones due to multiple reasons, one of which is the viable access to social media applications. Most of these applications are free of charge; hence, users can browse them all day and night making audio or video calls with their beloved ones. In addition, social media offers swiftness and feasibility for people; this is due to the fact that Internet packages are affordable for the majority of customers with ultimately high speeds. Thus, anyone can enjoy texting and talking without voice lagging during calls. None of these remarkable changes would have been possible without social media presence in our lives.
From my point of view, I hold the notion that such significant development in telecommunication ways has both merits and demerits. Regarding merits, it is possible for family members to contact one another even if they live distantly. Facebook Messenger and Whatsapp have made it accessible for their users to stay in contact, which evidently preserves unity among families; moreover, it keeps the strength of the relationships among intimate friends. As for demerits, social media has affected the sociality and the traditions negatively. For example, a vast number of individuals now opt for greeting each other during special events via social media rather than getting together and have quality time.
To conclude, plenty of reasons contribute to changing the way people communicate with each other, and I reiterate that this change has facilitated keeping people in touch; however, it has direly promoted social isolation among them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, as for, for example, in addition, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67205607825 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632996632997 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1578203417 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.461538462 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355403086103 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111822365708 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817076065961 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218721970893 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514692455231 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.