Some believe that children learn better when they are placed in classes with children of similar academic abilities. Others believe that children learn better when they are in classes with children representing a diverse range of academic abilities.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
There are some people who believe children learn better in company of children with similar academic abilities, whereas there are some who believe children learn better with other children representing a variety of academic abilities. While both these views have their pros and cons, in my opinion, children learns much better in a class with students having varying academic abilities.
Classes where every student has similar academic abilities enables the children to further groom their existing skills. They can master their abilities by observing other students and constant learning. This might even lead to a prospective career direction for the child. However, encouraging strengthening of limited abilities might result in fewer growth opportunities for the child.
In my opinion, children learn better when they placed in classes with a wide range of academic abilities as this broadens their learning spectrum and generates more career opportunities. Children learn about various skills and abilities from each other. They learn to respect others' abilities. It might also be possible that a child may develop a new ability or skill which can further develop his/her mind. Learning different academic abilities also enables a child to become more confident, grooming their personality and making them more ready for future. Despite these advantages, this method might also have a drawback in the sense that some children might not be able to master any one ability or are confused regarding their abilities.
Educating children and preparing them for a good academic future is responsibility of every parent. Placing children in a similar learning environment or a diverse learning environment will have a great impact on their education. Although, both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, it is the duty of the parents to choose the best method for their child looking at his/her capabilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... some people who believe children learn better in company of children with similar aca...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...eople who believe children learn better in company of children with similar academ...
^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ere are some who believe children learn better with other children representing a vari...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...child. In my opinion, children learn better when they placed in classes with a wide...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, whereas, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49158249158 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.742324512 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9568008764 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491545003578 0.244688304435 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173104907268 0.084324248473 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176900863497 0.0667982634062 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31027295019 0.151304729494 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20167702027 0.056905535591 354% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.