It is an unarguable fact that junk food consumption has been mushroomed by white-colored employees in the digital age because of several reasons. As a result of this trend, the life span of citizens has been impacting profoundly and it forced the governments to increase the impost. In my opinion, this would be an excellent initiative in order to lessen the intake of street foods.
To embark upon, due to technological evolutions in the modern age, various kinds of job opportunities have been created which are mostly sedentary. Moreover, office workers will not have any time to prepare homemade cuisines because of the materialistic lifestyle. These kinds of eatable items are not only harmful but can also make any humans as lazy persons. Healthy citizens play a vital role in the economic growth of any country so it is imperative for governments to increase the levy on preprocessed meals. Therefore, working professionals could opt for any other healthy edible choices.
Few developed nations have already imposed this act. Initially, citizens of these nations defiance the law, they slowly realized the importance of healthy diet. Now, more and more employees inclined to devour nutrition foods. On top of this, governments should also provide more alternative methods such as reducing the prices of organic foods and vegetables. Apart from this, both employers and governments should educate the employees about adverse effects on hazardous foods.
To conclude, high raising the prices on fast foods would be a good start to reduce the utilization. Furthermore, counseling sessions should be conducted on what type of intakes can assist in keeping them fit and healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... this act. Initially, citizens of these nations defiance the law, they slowly realized ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28996282528 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85899950928 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9916463064 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.8666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1646293461 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487895602291 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341457783085 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898510806656 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245932568493 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.