Taxing Industries, corporates and individuals based on their environmental footprint is the only way to save the environment. Do you agree with the statement? Give your opinion.
Of late, pollution levels in the environment have been increasing profoundly because of industrialization and the unaccountability of citizens. As a result of this, the government has been forced to impose the tax not only on businesses but also on individuals. In my opinion, bureaucrats should come up with other alternative approaches rather imposing more levy.
To embark upon, enlarging cess would lead to a plethora of negative impacts. Firstly, this would cause outrage, especially in below-par salaried employees. Secondly, they end up having no disposable income as they are already being charged direct as well as indirect taxes. Therefore, the finical crisis might arise.
On the other hand, profit margins of any organization might hit the lowest levels and overcome from this situation human power would be replaced with more robots. Thus, the unemployment rate would increase significantly. Apart from this, excess of green tax amount could be transferred to product prices which means inflation will be increased in society. In addition, industrialists might look for other permutation methods such as operating the business from any offshore countries.
If the government is keen on protecting the atmosphere from contaminating, there are plenty of other ways for instance afforestation, vetoing the plastic covers and bags. Also, it would be an excellent initiative to promote public transportation system. In addition to this, authoritative authorities can offer subsidies to the factories which are taking measures to control carbon emissions.
To conclude, pollution can be reduced in many ways such as planting more trees, leveraging dispensable products. Nonetheless, amending the taxes is definitely not one of them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67803030303 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18643244065 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67803030303 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9492895737 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0557785103579 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0176642236148 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0231566428446 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0328833958301 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025620843124 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.