In some countries, people who commit less serious crimes are made to undertake community service* instead of a prison sentence. Some people believe that all people who have committed a crime should be sent to prison.
Do you agree or disagree?
*compulsory work helping the community, such as decorating public facilities, which they must carry out in their spare time for a given period.
I largely disagree with what some members of society consider as proper imprisoning anyone who engages in any form of criminal activity. It would be more appropriate to contain the punishment for lower degree mischieves by subjecting the guilty to social service.
Firstly, penalty should be commensurate with the extent of harm done, in order to have a lasting positive rehabilitation. Neither an excess nor a deficit doze of enforced distress can evoke the desired result of refraining from similar activities in future. For example, if an impoverished man who succumbs to stealing is sent to jail, it may aggravate incidences of thefts involving him- as he would have found the prison a much guaranteed source of regular food. On the other hand, if he were to be asked to do voluntary service with similar supply of meals, he might even have found a means of earning his bread with physical work. Thus, sentences should be prescribed by carefully judging the need.
Secondly, outrageous criminals behind the bars can disrupt the already delicate integrity of amateur miscreants. This can have lasting consequences on the balance of law and order in the community, as the networking opportunities in the prison house can produce dormant anti social elements. For instance, modus operandi sharing can go viral within the four walls, only to send out more sophisticated outlaws. Therefore, it is extremely important to save the innocent defaulters from the hands of novice barbarians swarming the prison walls.
In conclusion, though only an adept walk through of free service as a form of rebuking may solicit reformation, it cannot be done away with to make way for cell life irrespective of the kind of misdeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...t of refraining from similar activities in future. For example, if an impoverished man wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8698614642 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652482269504 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4844846082 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125431207439 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415373967982 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318053657845 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664616168189 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328384725129 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.