Nowadays, smoking is one of the concerned issues in society. Therefore, most nations have established laws against smoking tobacco in public areas(for example offices and restaraunts). However other nations claim that there is no intention of doing so. In this essay, we will reckon the fundamental arguments on both parties of this of this discussion and draw a conclusion.
First of all, the proponents of laws against smoking claim that it is beneficial to society, because it affects on smokers health. Thus, it will affect on others in public buildings, who sits close to the smoker. As a result, smoking will cause health problems such as tuberculosis after a period of time. Furthermore, supporters of this view say that banning smoking will prevent such affections. Secondly, smokers will perhaps involve other people to smoke in public areas. As a result, there will be more smokers day by day. Moreover, those who support forbidding smoking by rules add that this concerns will aslo help to stop affection on youngsters health that will damage by smokers.
On the other hand, opponents of this view cite arguments that prohibiting such kind of smoking with rules, perhaps will not be the best way to do. Firstly, it will cut taxes off as a result of reduced smoking and also will be cause to the collapse of smoking industry. Furthermore, those work at these industry may be lost their jobs. Example can be seen in developing countries where smoking is banned in social areas and this resulted in broke down of industry that produce cigarettes.
In counclusion, it seems to me that restraining smoking through rules will be not the best way to do. In my opinion, perhaps the best step will educate youngsters to do not smoke, because of damages of smoking. Therefore, I am biased to second party
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of this'.
Suggestion: of this
...e fundamental arguments on both parties of this of this discussion and draw a conclusion. Fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smokers'' or 'smoker's'?
Suggestion: smokers'; smoker's
...icial to society, because it affects on smokers health. Thus, it will affect on others ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ffects on smokers health. Thus, it will affect on others in public buildings, who sits cl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...h problems such as tuberculosis after a period of time. Furthermore, supporters of this view s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smokers'' or 'smoker's'?
Suggestion: smokers'; smoker's
... areas. As a result, there will be more smokers day by day. Moreover, those who support...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youngsters'' or 'youngster's'?
Suggestion: youngsters'; youngster's
...rns will aslo help to stop affection on youngsters health that will damage by smokers. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...result of reduced smoking and also will be cause to the collapse of smoking industry. Fu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this industry' or 'these industries'?
Suggestion: this industry; these industries
...ng industry. Furthermore, those work at these industry may be lost their jobs. Example can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the best step will educate youngsters to do not smoke, because of damages of smok...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94426229508 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65764756261 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547540983607 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9807707318 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7777777778 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230171510675 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778889981079 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603498053009 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157041842519 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975415537135 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.