Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favor.
Smoking has became a major concern in many industrialized territories nowadays and there should be an enacted rules to overcome such situation in social places. Some countries are not keen to take part and impose laws opposed to smoking in such places. We will consider both sides of the discussion in this essay.
On the one hand, those countries which support enacting laws on smoking promote the idea that this would have dreadful impact on citizen's health and well-being that could cause vast majority of diseases among infants, pregnant's women and children. Also, smoke itself contains thousands of highly hazardous substances which could easily spread in the air and lead to inevitable consequences. Moreover, employees who are considerably addicted to cigarettes would definitely need to smoke every 30 minutes which could cause them career destruction. For example, in china, there is a penalty for everybody smoking in federal places and if that happens again, they most probably imprison the offender for three months.
On the another hand, opponent countries against such law cite that they are solely dependent on importing and exporting tobacco products and that would have significant impact on their economic system. In this case, they mention that higher taxes have already been imposed on these products to prevent people to not to purchase them. It seems that they actually are considering to gain more profits rather than their citizen's health and that is why there would be no restricted rules for smoking. It worth to note that, in any profitable business like this, mafia groups will not permit the government to ruin their incredibly high earnings.
Overall, I would tend to side with countries where have enacted law against smoking in public places. It would be the prime decision which would be beneficial for people's health and also for economic either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
Smoking has became a major concern in many industrialized ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...that this would have dreadful impact on citizens health and well-being that could cause ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es health and also for economic either.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, moreover, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21710526316 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52774596305 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.798447352 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230319755189 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900760698046 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780809040085 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147299198793 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373535232726 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.