In most countries the educational systems focuses on teaching theoretical aspects and have lessen attention on practical skills. I completely disagree with the idea that gaining skills on practical subjects should be allocated more time.
There are several reasons why obtaining facts should be the first priority for all schools and universities. Firstly, It helps students to gain fundamental knowledge regarding to that subject. And without that, The graduated person will not become useful and contribute to his/her countries' economical system. Secondly, being familiar with a subject well, it may lead them for better career in the future. Finally, this method may have many advantages for the individual. The most important part of that would be a student who recently graduated and have broader look towards what learnt, can solve problems in a professional matter. For example, we all may know someone who has left the school and started a new occupation without requiring knowledge. In my opinion, he would not be as successful as somebody who mastered that subject with proper methods.
I believe that practical skills should be taught after theoretical facts. It would be a bad way of teaching because the person finally become confused about which course should use in order to advance his career and earn money. Furthermore, Focusing time and effort much on practical skills would be the waste of time and person may become distressed. For example, such person can cause fatal mistakes in his job which might lead to career destruction.
In conclusion, my view is that the educational systems in any countries should focus on the theoretical and proven facts rather than paying too much attention to practical skills. It is wrong to spend time and effort teaching practical skills without proper and fundamental knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lessened'.
Suggestion: lessened
...n teaching theoretical aspects and have lessen attention on practical skills. I comple...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ful and contribute to his/her countries economical system. Secondly, being familiar with a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thout proper and fundamental knowledge.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28911564626 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71479075655 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7299696224 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119628350689 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428936752787 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491766749759 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906492732147 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382837381739 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.