The majority of countries have already prohibited smoking tobacco in public places including offices and restaurants. However, the passing laws against smoking is a conroversial tactic which appears to have a numer of contradictore effects and therefore the remaining countries do not aspire to do this. We wiil consider both sides of the discussion in this essay.
On the one hand those who support it promote the idea that prohibition will lead to lower consumption and thus lower risks of dangerous diseases such as cancer and stroke reusltin from addiction. They point to evident from countries including Singapore where this appears to be the case, and urge other nations to follow suit. Furthermore, proponents of such laws claim that consuming excessive amount of tobacco has a detrimental effect on people's health leading to inadequate development of their lungs and brains.
However, opponents are able to cite evidence from other countries such as Bulgaria and Italy where smoking at the restaurants is legal in spite of the fact that high taxes have been imposed by the governments. In these countries, the effect has been to force people to pay more taxes for smoking although it has not prohibited tobacco at all. Moreover, critics of ban highkight the difficulty of relaxation without smoking, which may assist to ameliorate a frame of mind afrer work, while having dinner at the restaurant.
In conclusion, it woulde be advisable to reduce the level of smokers by passing speacial laws. It seems to be reasonable to impose such laws which may contribute to well lessen the risks of diseases and addiction among people. It would be better to urge as many counties as possible to follow this notion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... On the one hand those who support it promote the idea that prohibition will l...
^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'promotes'?
Suggestion: promotes
... On the one hand those who support it promote the idea that prohibition will lead to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lungs and brains. However, opponents are able to cite evidence from other cou...
^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a frame of mind afrer work, while having dinner at the restaurant. In conclusi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12056737589 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.748856025 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5046050399 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310309784219 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106953229535 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879306208733 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183677568428 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145085998551 0.056905535591 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.