These days, young people tend to spend a year off after the final high school examination working or travelling, then continuing their studies. This issue is being interested and applied by teenagers. In many cases, this trend could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure. I will discuss this problem below.
First, gap-year would waste their time if they do not have specific plans. Given that they do not know what they have to face, they can not anticipate the difficulties they have. Therefore, gap-year makes people spend a lot of time, money but not effectively and achieve worthy benefits. For example, Quang, one of my brother, just passed the graduation exam. Because of stress, he chose a gap year but did not have a specific plan. Then every day, he got depressed because he did not know what to do. He spent too much time, money on useless things that did not bring any benefit during the 1 year gap year.
Second, gap year brings more experiences and helps young people understand themselves better. They will be challenged with new experiences, new professions to find out what is right for them. Besides, when trying different jobs, teenagers will earn a small amount of money and save it. To exemplify this point, Diep, my sister, since she did not choose a gap year, she went to university immediately after graduating from high school. Because she did not understand the nature of the major, after about 2 years of study, she felt depressed and found that the major was not suitable. with me and decided to change majors. Changing majors midway through like this made her have to start everything from scratch.
In conclusion, for all aforementioned reasons, I believe that having a gap year properly will help us have a more experience and a multidimensional view in ourselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
... found that the major was not suitable. with me and decided to change majors. Changi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88709677419 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62680689509 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6536120947 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7368421053 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217795536371 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626484664395 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589116788025 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123554132962 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270145525225 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.