Thesedays, some universities providing internet-based courses as the alternatives for conventional learning methods. This tendency, in many cases, should be more beneficial.
First, online courses help learners save their money and time because they should be flexible in learning locations that are suitable for their schedule. They also could be decreased fees as a result of their universities should cut off costs for renting apartments, using electricity, hiring housekeeping staff and other fees. With lower fees, students having poor conditions could also be able to access the education system, which leads to raise average school education rates, especially in developing and underdeveloped countries. Tom Edison, an education expert, pointed out that 87 percent of students in Vietnam have participated in one online course at least because they could study in any places with unlimited time.
Second, courses based on the Internet help students have opportunities to gain international knowledge in their own country. With several devices connecting to the Internet, people could completely register internet-based courses in the universities from different countries in the world. This helps them boost language skills, make foreign friends, acquire useful knowledge and in parallel, they could not suffer homesickness and culture shock. For example, my sister having a distance course in Cambridge University could experience a high quality course with reasonable cost in my home. On the other hand, she still improved her essential skills and had the best conditions to study as my parents did all the housework for her.
In conclusion, two most prominent advantages of distance learning are time-saving, money-saving and knowledge-boosting, proving that this is a positive development in society. With these benefits, I predict that this trend will continue into the future, leading to the use of online courses as the alternatives for conventional learning methods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, still, at least, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69023569024 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09791390999 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6441386774 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238957766895 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862488292663 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475528577269 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147751998706 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209763217475 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.