In many parts of the world, a large proportion of income is generated through touristry. While this trend might be adverse to some extent, it, in numerous cases, would be a beneficial tendency.
First, tourism creates employment in services such as accommodation, transport, and entertainment. This leads to a decrease in the unemployment rate. Thanks to such services, inhabitants in my hometown, who used to constitute unemployed, now could make and meet a better income. Moreover, the tourist industry also plays a critical role in attracting investment from multinational companies and wealthy foreign investors which could boost local economies and improve infrastructure.
Admittedly, the travel industry might constitute one of the contributors to environmental contamination. When it comes to this, Viet Nam, a country located in Southeast Asia would be a good case in point. According to statistics in 2019 from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of this country, the estimated amount of plastic waste discharged by tourists to sea and island resorts amounted to more than 230 thousand tons. However, this could be improved by the intervention of local authorities and local residents. They could post more guards around tourist destinations to prevent the indiscriminate dumping of garbage. Another negative influence is that tourism may put pressure on infrastructure and local resources such as food, water, and energy which results from overcrowding. In fact, a significant amount of historical buildings were damaged due to a large number of tourists flooding but this could be dealt with by increasing the entry fees or restricting the number of tourists in such places.
To recapitulate, although travel has some downsides, it does not overshadow the positive impact on the locals. I believe the growth of this industry would be a favorable tendency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cases, would be a beneficial tendency. First, tourism creates employment in ser...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 875, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...istorical buildings were damaged due to a large number of tourists flooding but this could be dea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48287671233 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19661834302 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626712328767 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9685021708 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0858039426004 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289334653771 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336990416573 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543033420597 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276330139839 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.