Some educationalists think that internation exchange visits will benefit teenagers at the school. To what extent do the advantages outweighs the disadvantages?
Collaborations among the countries have become increasingly important nowadays for the growth of a nation. Although these are practiced at the government level, It is equally imperative to have such programs at the school level by having International Exchange visits of the students. More benefits for the students such as cultural exchange and increased subject expertise can be achieved by conducting student exchange programs.
Evidence suggests that students exposed to wider cultures are likely to develop a range of interpersonal skills and adopt best practices of other cultures. To illustrate further, Japanese students are responsible for keeping their classrooms neat and tidy, which can be adopted by Indian students when they both interact and exchange their ideas. When students are restricted just to their home country culture, their level of socializing skills and ideas becomes limited. Cultural collaboration is something that has to be imbibed at the early stage itself in order to groom the best citizens of the world.
Furthermore, students of the current generation have to compete not just with their fellow country mates, but with international students. Although students can learn more from their own curriculum, It is highly recommended that they interact with other country students to understand their skills and level of expertise. Without gaining knowledge on German technologies, for example, Indian students cannot make an incredible mark in the Automobile industry, which necessitates the need for early collaboration between Indian and German students. If the countries still didn't embark on such practices, no students will be able to achieve anything concrete in the International arena.
In conclusion, It is of no doubt that the merits of early interaction among the international students definitely outstrips the demerits. The role of governments and international bodies is extremely crucial in promoting such ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...German students. If the countries still didnt embark on such practices, no students w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, still, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65202702703 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01926301301 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5155826227 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.692307692 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09144192498 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380718519754 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473827513729 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667152873166 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513406529766 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.