Some employers offer their employees subsidized membership of gym or sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in so doing.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the cutthroat-competitive world, we are submerged with umpteen responsibilities that we hardly get time for physical exercise. Sound health plays an indispensable role in our life and work performance. However, the bone of contention here is whether employers offer their employees subsidize gyms or club membership or not. I will shed light on both the views and give my perspective.
To begin with, proponents have opined that gyms or sports club subsidy offered by employers brings the mental fitness and wellness. Moreover, exercise is a prerequisite for optimal work performance. To epitomize, sportive people take fewer sick leaves leading to the least disruption to daily operation in their workplace. Furthermore, it helps to build team spirit and ameliorate interpersonal skills. In addition, sports club aid by companies will implicitly convey to employees that employers do care about the wellness of their team alongside profit-making. Perhaps, they will pay extra effort at work if they are valued.
Conversely, opponents have opined that organizations should focus on incentives that merely matter to workers such as pay increments, job satisfaction, low workload, free child education, holidays, and job appraisal. Additionally, motivation also plays a key role to excel their performance. For example, studies show that staff works more dedicated when they are motivated and awarded rather than having facilities like gyms.
To conclude, I believe that gyms or sports clubs membership is one aspect to induce employees. Albeit a plethora of other monetary, non-monetary, tangible, and intangible rewards are more useful to promote productivity at work
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61417322835 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25090066546 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688976377953 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7152250383 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307940450956 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867714454351 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792319487512 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16415575286 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657426367024 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.