Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.
Do you think the advantages of free admission outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums and art galleries generally preserve the cultural heritage of a place. It is quite controversial amongst people whether these museums and art galleries shall charge entry fees or not. Some of these places have free admission, whereas some charge nominal entry fees. I personally believe there are many advantages of charging admission fees and somehow those overshadow its disadvantages.
There is a plethora of merits of keeping an admission fee for certain museums and art galleries. These museums and art galleries generally include idols, paintings, engravings, sculptures and historic books, which require maintenance on a regular and frequent basis. This maintenance comes with a cost. Moreover, the staff required to maintain the belongings of these museums and art galleries need to be paid. Further, if the museum includes educational material, there is a cost associated with the provision of educational equipment and accessories such as headphones. This demands of imposing an admission fee to museum and art galleries, which ensures all belongings are maintained well.
On the other hand, some believe that museums and art galleries should have free entry. This is substantiated by the fact that people refrain from entering these places because of the admission fees. For instance, tourists, especially, will divert their minds in visiting other places rather than visiting museums and art galleries. In fact, these places may lose their charm and will be ineffective in attracting local residents and tourists.
It is quite imperative that the pre-historic museums and art galleries represent the cultural character of a place and preserving them should be a priority. Despite the fact that preserving and maintaining these museums involve cost, I strongly believe that there are many advantages of charging admission fees for such places, which far outweigh its disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54794520548 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90311594529 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1183795161 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331942658093 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119354624603 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932984231826 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216342889096 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612530316397 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.