Art galleries and museums ave different approaches regarding fees; some allow the public free entrance, whereas others require fees. There are some drawbacks to provide entrance with some fees, but i think the benefits are far more.
To begin with, access with fees have few shortcomings. Firstly, some poor students will not get into the mesuem to learn about ancient thing and observe the prehistorical phenomenon. To illustrate, in mesuem, there are stored thousands of things such as sculptures, arts, image exhibiting the early days, and so on, which teach us loads of things. So, if a student will not get a chance to enter into the museum if some fees are required and he will miss lots of thing to watch.
However, taking some fees will be a great way to avail the cost of maintenance. As, in the museum almsot everything is too old and it need so much care to stay exactly as previous. Provided that there is no sufficient money coming from authority or the government, there will be lost of numerous items of history, which is unacceptable to everyone. In this case, there is no alternative to take some allowance from the guests. Furthermore, asking for fees will be a barrier to bad teenagers from entering into museum. Bad juvenile would not like to spent money to make some chaos inside the museum. For example, in front of National museum of Bangladesh, few worse boys disturb girls while entering into it. however, they do not get inside the museum. As a result of this, people, especially women are staying safe and secure, and enjoying the worth of museum.
In conclusion, though it is a ressitance to the poor learners to access inside the museum if it takes fees, taking fees will help the personnel to maintain caring expenditure and prohibit the bad people from enter. I think authoritise can take it into consideration to give poor students free access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...to provide entrance with some fees, but i think the benefits are far more. To ...
^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...some fees are required and he will miss lots of thing to watch. However, taking some fees ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82098765432 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61221994376 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9895356877 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8823529412 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187694840338 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624027383343 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455795758622 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118308274266 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511195270855 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.