In this age of technological advancements, mobile phones have become a necessity for everyone. With the growing usage of technology around the globe, children cannot be prevented to use mobile phones anyway. While some parents find it rational for their kids to use mobile phones, others may not agree and advocate about keeping the children away from technology as much as possible. In this essay, I will discuss both views and express my thoughts on this matter.
Firstly, using technology to make life more convenient cannot be considered detrimental in any way. Hence, by allowing the youngsters to keep mobile phones, it becomes easier for parents to keep track of them. Similarly, if any child feels that they are in some sort of danger, they can simply use their mobile phones to call the police and their parents.
Next, though children should be allowed to use their cell-phones freely, parents should ensure that they are not over-using it. This responsibility lies with the parents to check their children’s activities and encourage them involving in outdoor activities instead of letting them keep using their mobile phones all the time.
Lastly, the invention of mobile phones is still considered revolutionary. As per the research conducted by Airtel Ltd, mobile phone users are growing at a rate of 20% per year. Nowadays, people cannot imagine their lives without a mobile phone. If youngsters are denied mobile phones, it will only make them rebellious.
In essence, a mobile phone is no longer a luxury but a necessity of life. By allowing children mobile phones, parents can enhance their safety measures. Apart from this, using their mobile phones children stay in touch with their friends in real-time, which may be crucial for their studies as well. However, it is to be made sure that they are using cell-phones productively and not misusing them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, may, similarly, so, still, well, while, apart from, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65318350199 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6264649556 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0588235294 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254501279721 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923804850062 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061021120297 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157659952762 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437804178593 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.