Some people are fond of buying new gadgets, phones and laptops. Is it good or bad things? Discuss your opinion.
It has been witnessed that purchasing lasted gizmos, such as smartphones and laptops are likes by many sections of the society. Although some might consider it viable, I feel otherwise and believe it might impact financial stability and the environment.
To begin, the race to own a new phone and gadget is the worst way to spend the money. Majority of an electronic device come with an enormous amount. The frequency with which companies are launching new commodities with a price tag of hundred and thousands of dollars is fanatic. However, as the resale price of these goods is low, people usually recover only fraction of original cost hence end up putting more money for purchasing device. Spending too much money on new devices can put individuals under tremendous financial distress.
Furthermore, the majority of gadget can cause severe problems to the environment. A common problem is people tend to throw away the old piece of technology once they acquire the new one. Major part of these devices do not get disposed properly and components from these will make the environment harmful. To illustrate, batteries made from lithium become explosive in intensive heat and can make ground contaminated. One more impact on the environment is the amount of waste in the form of plastic that these products contains which ultimately pollute the land and water.
To conclude, I believe that the practice of buying the latest devices, mobile phones and laptops have a detrimental effect on environment and financial conditions of an individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'device'?
Suggestion: device
...nd the money. Majority of an electronic devices come with an enormous amount. The frequ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, so, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17786561265 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78059237943 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632411067194 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0332667319 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.769230769 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101508018001 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317521332687 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332902612649 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549081181145 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274810959462 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.