Some people are very interested in researching their family history. Other people say this is a waste of time and that we should focus instead on a present and future generations. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion
Over the last few years, it has been observed that a section of people is getting quite anxious to study about the past events of their families, whereas, another mass considers it as futile and rather suggest concentrating more on the prevailing and the upcoming generations. Although, both the phenomena are true in their own respect, however, I believe that paying attention to the current as well as the forthcoming generations will benefit us in the long run. Hence, in this essay, I will discuss both the sides of the argument and explain my support in favour of the latter view.
To begin with, extensive study about the past events of a family might help to overcome many unforeseen challenges that might tend to show up in the future. For instance, a research scientist from the University of California recently invented the cure of a specific inherited mental disorder named "Huntington Disease" by studying and getting deep into the past family records of the patient. Moreover, getting into the earlier events of the family might also help to predict the success rates of a problem that could arise in the future. Therefore, it is quite evident why a particular section of people is interested to study deeply about the past records of their family.
On the contrary, just like another mass believes studying family history as a useless phenomenon, I too agree with the point that people should leave their past behind and concentrate much on the current as well as their upcoming events because that will not only keep the future secured, but will also make the present bright and livable. For example, currently, there is a tremendous rise in the immigration of people from poor countries to the developed countries like USA and Canada. This is happening because people prefer to live a better life and also to provide a better future to their next generations. Additionally, people are becoming more conscious and goal oriented to guide their future generations in all the best ways possible. Thus, we have a clear view about why we should aim on working on our present and forthcoming generations.
Therefore, to put it in a nutshell, I pen down, saying that, although family history plays a vital role in understanding the past events of a family in a better way, however, working on the current as well as the on our future prospects can ultimately be more fruitful for our forthcoming generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ve that paying attention to the current as well as the forthcoming generations will benefi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ords of their family. On the contrary, just like another mass believes studying...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94390243902 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76388388585 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50487804878 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0020907006 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.923076923 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5384615385 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242794253521 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856347570316 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449971317107 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13632192959 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691984282068 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.