Experimenting on animals as alertnatives for humans has always been debateable amongst some people. Although, some people believe that this experiments are necessary to discover new scientific issues, there are many who believe that this process should be banned by law. They argue that there must be an alternative for researchers and this experimentations can be regulated.
On the one hand, scientists use animals to conduct scientific researches in academic laboratoaries. Using animals as laboratoary's materials has always been a good idea because there are some kind of creatures which are identical as human's genes. In addition, experimenting on animals will lower the cost of researches because we cannot simply use a person's body for academic purposes. For example, there are some types of mice that offer the exact same cell behaivioural as our bodies. Consequently, we can apply some academic experiments on these animals instead of testing directly on people.
On the other hand, animals which are targeted by our research teams, may suffer during the tests or even some tests may be dangerous for their health and causing to their death. In other words, we, as human being, are targeting other creatures for our selfish desires and knowledge. Hence, it can be seen that animals, which are used in our labs, are not living their lives normally like other animals do.
In conclusion, while it is the only option for us to use animals in our medical research laboroatories in order to improve our knowledge about medical sub-fields, we can still focus on finding alternative ways to conduct this researches without targetting animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t be an alternative for researchers and this experimentations can be regulated. O...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...been a good idea because there are some kind of creatures which are identical as hum...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, may, so, still, while, even so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24150943396 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87460988422 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.875425924 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323613158777 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12776123727 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748106165358 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200885212295 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103113510222 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.