It is considered by many that, people who are fit and well-built can attain higher success in sports competitions, whereas there are others who are of the view that mental strength is the key for achieving success in sports. I find it more logical to endorse the first view, rhhe reasons for which will be enumerated in this essay after evaluating both the views.
On the one hand, being mentally stronger will help individuals and teams to come back from their failures. This means that, it will enable them to learn from their mistakes and when they correct these mistakes, it will encourage them to win the next game. For example, a research conducted by the Oxford University press in 2015 found out that, people who are me tally strong are more motivated than others to win a game. Furthermore, being mentally stoing will reduce the risk of depression when people lose a game, they can calm their minds in these situations.
On the other hand, I believe that people who are fitter and stronger can achieve greater success in sports.This is due the fact that, individuals/teams who are physically fit can easily beat their peers. They don't have to worry about the physical confrontation which occurs during a game. In these situations strong people can easily overpower their competitors. So to succeed, they only need to maintain their fitness level. For instance, a person who have a good endurance can easily win a race by using his/her full capacity.
In conclusion, although some people may argue that good mental attitude is necessary to acheive success in sports, I believe that fitness also play a significant role in being successful in sports competitions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...r can achieve greater success in sports.This is due the fact that, individuals/teams...
^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y fit can easily beat their peers. They dont have to worry about the physical confro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93639575972 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65629446992 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565371024735 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3450093132 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.416666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259539611322 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942889658319 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922548758015 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180001881239 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636065963426 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.