some people argue that the government should help people who cannot afford to buy a house.
do you agree or disagree?
One of the basic Human Rights is to have a shelter as per the UN decrees. That is why some people are advocating for this right and they believe it is the government's responsibility to provide the poor people with economic apartments. This essays totally agrees with this initiative because prices of properties are rocketing, especially in many developing countries, and this is state's commitment towards its impoverished citizens.
To begin with, the cost of flats or houses in many places the world over make it virtually impossible for any average citizen to be able to purchase on his own. That is to say that governments should either establish economic housing project in which the prices would be comparatively affordable if compared with private real-estate developers prices, or to subsidize the prices for the best advantage of their people. For example, many of Cairo dwellers, especially young people, complain about incredibly expensive flats that they cannot afford. As a two-bedroom flat in Cairo outskirts costs approximately one million Egyptian pound, while the average monthly salary for a fresh graduated young man cannot exceed 3000 pound, so it would be impossible for countless number of young Egyptian to get a house unless a supportive measures from the authorities were taken.
Added to this factor, given the fact that governmental budget is collected from taxpayers, taxes from companies operating in their territory and exporting of country's raw materials, this money should be spent back on at least basic necessities of their people. Definitely, a suitable house is undoubtedly worth spending state fund on. If they do not foster such noble missions, what benefits government have then. In the UAE for example, although it is relatively affluent nation, there is a house offered for every local who completed his education for free as a gift from his nation. This strengthens the loyalty among youths and relief them from a substantial burden. However, some other leaders in less developed countries argue that their budgets are not as enormous as the GCC countries, but if they stop corruption, they might have abundance of financial resources.
In conclusion, having demonstrated the aforementioned ideas and relevant examples, it can be reiterated that authorities in each country should take the lead and provide a decent housing for their people because states can afford to do so and in the first place they are elected to provide them with basic needs like housing subsidizing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...r this right and they believe it is the governments responsibility to provide the poor peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... graduated young man cannot exceed 3000 pound, so it would be impossible for countles...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'measure'?
Suggestion: measure
...tian to get a house unless a supportive measures from the authorities were taken. A...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 227, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... money should be spent back on at least basic necessities of their people. Definitely, a suitable...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h basic needs like housing subsidizing.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, in the first place, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24197530864 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85820360478 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582716049383 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.0495822898 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.642857143 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133816676217 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454964175276 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522312773042 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846945104339 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024947233743 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.