Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher pollution. Whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both the views and give opinion
Environment is not a national asset. It is shared responsibility of one and all. Some people believe that huge taxes should be levied on industries as they creating more pollution whereas others opined that a myriad of practical fixes exist exit for this issue. I will shed some light on both the views and then give my opinion.
On the positive side, taxes should be collected from industries as they create a lot of pollution in the terms of noise, air etcetera as compared to others such as households. Nowadays most industries dispose of their waste directly into a pond or river, consequently, water get polluted and will be no longer hygienic for drinking. By imposing heavy taxes, pollution can be controlled up to some extent as they will become more careful in future. Moreover, the smoke coming out of chimneys also creates air pollution. For example the Taj Mahal‘s white marble has changed its color to yellow due to the pollution created by nearby industries. Therefore, government should be imposed taxes to overcome it, as otherwise they will kill national heritage.
On the other hand instead of collecting taxes, industries should be bound to set up pollution control equipment. As higher taxes, increase only the product prices which is ultimately at the end bared by the consumers. Moreover government should define some restricted areas where industries should be banned such as households. In addition, pollution control standards can be fixed and regularly checked by officials. On the violation, high penalty can be imposed.
To sum up, I pen down saying that, although there are plethora of reasons for imposing high taxes on industries but it is not a pragmatic approach. As huge taxes only add the government and its official’s personal property not fix the pollution. In my opinion, instead of taxes, pollution control fixes should be taken into consideration before the clouds on horizon turned into perfectly storm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...extent as they will become more careful in future. Moreover, the smoke coming out of chim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...tely at the end bared by the consumers. Moreover government should define some restricte...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, moreover, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82223315833 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4921198214 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94444444444 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258794446824 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768073253739 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581402363096 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164729019629 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404932628035 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.