Some people argue that it is not wise for an industry yo replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often believed by some people that substituting old and proficient employees with new and amateur professional is not a prudent decision for an organization or business venture. However, In my opinion, I believe that young and naive employees are more dynamic, robust and enthusiastic and therefore are more beneficial for the industrial growth.
Firstly, owing to the qualities such as flexibility, creativity and quick learning ability, fresh workers are capable of applying new ideas and techniques which help the company to sustain in today's competitive world. Moreover, with more young folks joining in an organization keep the work culture lively which ultimately helps in better team-bonding. As a result more like-minded employees with common visions and methodologies could work together for the betterment of the company.
On the other hand, despite of the fact that old existing professionals are more experienced, there are some circumstances where they may not perform as good as their counterparts inexperienced employees. For instance, under extreme pressure when deliverables are under strict deadlines, old workers may not complete their assignments due to certain age or physical limitations. Moreover, because of their comfort level with their existing type of work, old workers are sometimes reluctant to adapt to new and more promising methodologies. As a result, industry's progress will be hampered.
In conclusion, with age creeping in, existing old employees capabilities deteriorates and therefore, it is profitable for the companies to replace them with more enthusiastic and innovative youths. Youths are full of spark and have zeal to implement latest techniques.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'implement the latest'.
Suggestion: implement the latest
...uths are full of spark and have zeal to implement latest techniques.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6420233463 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1781809623 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622568093385 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0141772549 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.818181818 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0909090909 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213075617682 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767907761516 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472024813767 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127025150819 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342094359431 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.