Industries hire young people without experience to take over the elder expert, it is often argued that it is an inadvisable choice. I strongly agree with this point of view, as I believe the competitive advantage of the company will be reduced, while also life period of the company will be short.
First of all, the departure of a large number of senior employees will reduce the competitiveness of the company. Such as, they gain experience in the field, and they would be able to make the right decisions at the right time while inexperienced employee only has a theory but no practical ability. Therefore, although it appears that the young have a lot of impactful new ideas, it can be argued that no ability to manufacture new products will cause the company to lose competitiveness.
Furthermore, the company’s life cycle becomes shorter without expertise worker support. This is because new employees do not have deep feelings for the company, and they will find jobs that are more beneficial to them, so they leave the company easily. While there is new blood coming to the company, it is clear that the company is not able to operate when professionals and a junior both leave the company for any reason.
In conclusion, a senior worker is the most important role in a company that they not only drive how to manufacture new products to maintain the company’s competitiveness, also is a pillar of the company who choosing and directing future talent to keep the company running. I recommend that a company should let the senior guide junior employees in order to nurture future talent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hort. First of all, the departure of a large number of senior employees will reduce the compet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82812824726 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542124542125 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5869548402 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.7 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110858453157 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481315195833 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431626280297 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072521491265 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347750357687 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.