Some people believe that all teenagers should have to do unpaid work during their free time in order to help the local community. They think this would benefit the teenagers doing the unpaid work but also society as a whole.
Do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that working free of cost for community by youngsters is beneficial not only for themselves, but also for society. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view for reasons stated below.
People who are against this concept of young people being engaged in social work argue that such activities are a wastage of precious time of the teenagers. As they are mostly caught up in their educational assignments and course works, dedicating time to charity work will most probably result in inability to concentrate on studies and, hence, poor academic performance. Moreover, they believe that such social activities can easily be performed in adulthood when these assistance skills are actually required in practical life.
However, I believe that there a number of reasons why children should be involved in unpaid social work at an early age. Firstly, by engaging in community work such as assisting indigent people in terms of food, clothing and shelter, young people can develop a positive attitude of forgiveness and a sense of gratitude towards the things they already have in their lives which they cannot learn by merely restricting themselves in their own communities. Secondly, act of helping others in poverty, working for rehabilitation, and mitigating environmental rubbish can turn them into responsible citizens and prepare them for real life challenges on becoming adults which is extremely beneficial for society as there is a dire need of such individuals nowadays.
In conclusion, although some people may say that community work is a time wastage for young children, I am of the opinion that such social work equips them with necessary skills which are advantageous for themselves and society as well. Therefore, unpaid charity work should be encouraged right from an early childhood.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29209621993 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83248660396 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591065292096 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.2204844441 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8 7.06120827912 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213821840205 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908102892527 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033384710141 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136241988033 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230191190029 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.