Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead.
In recent decades, the living conditions of people are getting better. As a result, the awareness of humankind toward the surrounding is on the rise. While the majority of citizens bear a thought that feral creatures need to be guarded, the other mass believes mankind should shield just a small number of these species. From my viewpoint, I support those who agree with the latter view. In the following essay, I will present the reasons why we must do this.
On the one hand, it can not be denied the fact that people would reap enormously benefits from all animals residing in the wild world. Firstly, feral species not only are the food resources nourishing us but also play a vital role in preserving biological diversity. A typical example is that some herbivores including rabbits, deers, and squirrels provide foodstuffs for humankind who living in remote religions next to the habitats of these creatures as well as carnivores. Secondly, there is an abundance of clothes, shoes made from animals-skin like buffaloes, which means a number of jobs serving in the exploitation industry related to creatures' products will be created.
On the other hand, the detrimental drawbacks of excessive exploitation and the increase of types of creatures should not be ignored and therefore, humankind must protect a small quality of crucial animals. Initially, the excess development of kinds of feral animals maybe threaten a group of others. This can be illustrated by the bring Asia's wild creatures to rainforests of South America in order to be the prey for native species, however, the uncontrolled growth of imported beasts in new places is the pivotal factor narrows houses of predators causing the reduction of such species.
Not to mention that the unrestrained hunt of people for entertainment and food demands puts many carnivores in danger leading to the extinction of these species such as tigers, leopards, and white bears.
In conclusion, despite the merits that mankind gets from the exploitation of wild animals, the protection of important wild creatures should be performed by people. Hence, everyone and governments on the global scale need to unite acting so as to solve this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ass believes mankind should shield just a small number of these species. From my viewpoint, I sup...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...present the reasons why we must do this. On the one hand, it can not be denied th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to creatures products will be created. On the other hand, the detrimental drawb...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...p of others. This can be illustrated by the bring Asias wild creatures to rainforests of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s causing the reduction of such species. Not to mention that the unrestrained hun...
^^^^
Line 11, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch as tigers, leopards, and white bears. In conclusion, despite the merits that m...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 239, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...n the global scale need to unite acting so as to solve this problem.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26685393258 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00403192427 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60393258427 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 176.78665295 49.4020404114 358% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.454545455 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3636363636 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1818181818 7.06120827912 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290597192015 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765017181385 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803011885481 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141072731637 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685885713913 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.