Some people believe that to be successful at sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful.
Discuss both views and give your opinion?
It is often argued that triumph in sports can be achieved by training with a strong determination and persistence, whilst
others disagree and believe that the innate talent should be needed to get succeed in sports. However, I agree with the former viewpoint in this essay and discuss both the opinions with examples.
On the one hand, one of the major reason for my assertion is that hard work can grow talent. As a result, every person is born with the same opportunities and it is an individual's commitment and dedication towards the sport that helps one to become a star. For example, Sachin Tendulkar, the worlds top-notch cricketer, practised for two years, 8 hours daily without taking a break for a single day; hence, catalyzing him to master the art of batting. Therefore, with rigorous training, a person can become triumphant in a specific sport.
On the other hand, certain people hold a different opinion and think that inborn talents help to be successful in a particular sport. For example, Sania Nehwal a well-renowned player had a natural ability to play the forward stroke which helped her to become the youngest badminton player from India. However, I believe that though born with innate talent, there should be a driven force like hard work and determination to become victorious in sports.
To conclude, while perseverance and ample training helps to become victorious in sports, some still feel that it should have inborn talents. However, as long as we are highly determined to the sport, success will be positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Others
...determination and persistence, whilst others disagree and believe that the innate ta...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ith the same opportunities and it is an individuals commitment and dedication towards the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03488372093 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71190446287 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7270793032 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.090909091 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205199127129 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800552812868 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584208498961 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113930322775 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469160201216 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.