Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this globalised era, there is a colossal upsurge in the trend to see the people discussing that the quantum of cars is accountable for environmental pollution and landfill. Whilst, others proclaim that the conglomerates of manufacturing are responsible for it. Thereby, in my opinion, both sectors are equally charged for environmental pollutions and damages, wherein this essay, I shall explain both sides of the arguments by analysing it.
On the one hand, compelling pieces of evidence prove that automobile vehicles cause major trash in cities. Firstly, the paramount reason is the increase in car usage leads to massive traffic congestion provided that cause air pollution since the combustion engines emit more smoke. Secondly, the mass production of cars along with deceptive advertisement entice people to upgrade their old cars. Upon the old car, the usable parts removed and other unusable parts disposed off as trash since these parts are imperishable it results in the pile of plastic waste.
On the other hand, people across the board state that industrial plants cause detrimental effects to the city. First and foremost, industries like leather, chemical or pharmaceutical companies use high chemicals which discharge their secretion of waste in the land or stream of river water. As a result, this causes serious repercussions to land like infertility as well as a human being like health issues. Moreover, these organisations use fossil fuels run their work engines which emit harmful gas along with carbon dioxide which pollutes the oxygen and put the city dwellers live in jeopardise.
In conclusion, an increase in vehicles and industries leads to air pollution and their throw away parts entitled to a stack of garbage. In my opinion, both sectors share equal credibility for such environmental damages and they should take necessary actions to solve this.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36241610738 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85018472965 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620805369128 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5160475562 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.923076923 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221796331781 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070912226096 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347188091771 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12042255295 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224110114013 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.