Few individuals consider that youngster should do only study relevant activities in their spare time or else it would be total time wastage. There are diverse views on this topic. However, I completely disagree with the statement and belive in contractive manner. I would discuss my view in following paragraphs.
First, I would like to begin with Sports. There are many sports game which helps young individual to gain a lot more than just study relevant advantage. If I take Cricket as an instance, I would say cricket is the game which helps group of young people to enhance their mind growth with their physical stamina. Sachin Tendulkar, who is wold famous cricketer, has started playing cricket in his extra time and he found cricket as his passion. If he has focused only on study relevant activity then he might have not achived what he has accomplished at this time.
Second, many of younger population has caught into social media. Social media is completely out of study purpose, yet some of them are able to earn quite a lot of money from it. Also, youngsters are making social media as their main source of income and leaving the higher education because they are doing excellent without it, which they might not do with the future ahead in study. Thus, restricting ourselves on study related environment could be detrimental for our future growth and opportunity.
In sum up, I would say by narrowing child's growth we would be restricting their personal development and providing limited opportunity. I do not believe that we should focuse solely on eduaction related activities, since other activities are as crusial as educational.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me and he found cricket as his passion. If he has focused only on study relevant a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00362318841 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64613581692 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9972838686 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143402709709 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424635735324 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393525128586 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864735991952 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295773462086 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.